News 
 Local News 
 News 
 General 
 Fight against Capalaba apartments continues 

Fight against Capalaba apartments continues

04 Feb, 2010 04:07 PM
A six storey, six building apartment block approved for Capalaba is being held up as an example of ‘infill development’ going ahead without community consultation, sanctioned by the council’s planning codes and able to be replicated in a number of areas across the city.

The 271-apartment development was approved by Redland City Council late last year without any community consultation because of changes that came in as part of the new Redlands Planning Scheme in 2006.

Angry residents of Aramac Court and surrounding streets have formed the Capalaba Progress Association to voice their concerns and will hold a protest and sponsor an e-petition in coming weeks, association chairperson Paul Gleeson said.

“We’re very concerned about significantly increased traffic and congestion at nearby major intersections, inadequate parking, shading over properties and reduced access for solar panels,” Mr Gleeson said.

“The council has completely failed to consult with us and the developers are proceeding with no concern for social impacts of this sudden population influx or realistic understanding of the other impacts that will be felt.”

Genevieve Gall of the Birkdale Progress Association said the development was symptomatic of the “infill development” set to be seen across south east Queensland, and could happen anywhere in the Redlands that was zoned this way.

“We will be trying to have the development overridden by the State Government, and have the council change their planning codes,” Ms Gall said.

“This is not at all in keeping with the 2030 Vision for Redlands that the council has only just completed, which says we want to be a ‘clean, green’ city, not a high rise one.”

Redland City councillor for Capalaba, Karen Williams, said the development was completely in keeping with council development laws, but she was working with council officers to secure changed parking conditions for the site and had approached the Department of Main Roads for permission to access the site from Mount Cotton Road instead of Aramac Court during construction.

“This block was zoned Medium Density Residential 1 (MDR1) when the planning scheme changed in an effort to streamline development and allow for increased densities to progress in certain areas,” Cr Williams said.

“It removed the need for consultation with the community as long as the development achieves all the ‘probable solutions’ required by the code, which this one did.

“I am seeking to have the consultation requirement put back into the planning scheme for MDR1 zones as part of the amendments the council is currently developing for the scheme.”

Neighbours to the site on Aramac Court were consulted a few years ago when an application was submitted for 52 townhouses on the block, but Cr Williams said that was under the old Planning Scheme when consultation was still required.

The Capalaba and Birkdale Progress Associations were due to meet with Redland City Mayor Melva Hobson and chief executive Gary Stevenson this week.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size
Page:
1

RELATED COVERAGE

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
But guys, come on now, why the fuss? Why the objection to the extra traffic, extra noise pollution and more people in an already croweded area.

Cr Debra Henry said it will have a 'green roof design' (that only a few can access and enjoy). She indicated it will be good for you - and the all-knowing Debra Henry knows best because she says so! And you will be naughty little pleb residents if you dare say she is wrong.

Posted by Paul, 4/02/2010 4:27:05 PM, on Bayside Bulletin
Progress associations. Some actually want progress, this lot are just aspiring to be handbrakes. You demand all the services of higher population community, but are too NIMBY to want the population increase to enable the delivery of all these goodies. You prefer to lock up great areas for koalas, instead of people. The people are coming and UP is the solution. Just get over yourselves.
Posted by burdened, 4/02/2010 7:47:40 PM, on Bayside Bulletin
Cr Debra Henry and her mates have a lot to answer for! They are not helping the environment, they are wrecking it! Is Cr Karen Williams the only one with sense? When well known and respected greenies like Genevieve Gall speakes out again this green roof stuff (which will only ruin the environment and lifestyle of residents), you know that this green council's days are numbered and Cr Henry has lost the plot!
Posted by Help Save Capalaba!, 4/02/2010 11:49:45 PM, on Bayside Bulletin
Does Cr Henry even think? She jumps on these green ideas, which may be good in theory, but doesn't stop to look at the bigger picture. Very illogical.

[comment has been edited]

Posted by Mack, 5/02/2010 9:30:43 AM, on Bayside Bulletin
People, continue your fight for justice and forget about the hot air. Let Karen Williams assist you as she is more approachable and friendly.

[comment has been moderated]

Posted by Barbara, 5/02/2010 10:06:57 AM, on Bayside Bulletin
It's great to see the Redlands finally moving forward. I understand that these type of developments are not popular at first but once they bring more jobs and services, as well as a hub for Capalaba, people will be quick to forget what they complained about in the first place.

Capalaba and the Redlands need high density developments such as this so that if the greenies want to keep their green space for koalas they can. People, you need to stop thinking about urban sprawl and think upward sprawl. Additionally, not many people in the Redlands will be able to afford a block of land and the costs for putting a house up, whereas providing dwellings like this will help keep affordability in check but also provide a lifestyle some people want.

Posted by past resident, 5/02/2010 11:24:15 AM, on Bayside Bulletin
Karen is caught on this one. She voted for the planning scheme. She voted to take away people's rights to see a proposal. Now she wants to put it back because the residents are angry. You can't be all things to all people.
Posted by Groovy Grandma, 5/02/2010 1:42:30 PM, on Bayside Bulletin
Of course this will be good. There will be 271 extra loaves of bread each day. 271 extra litres of milk each day. There are 271 extra homes to be furnished. Probably 271 extra cars to be serviced, repaired and fuelled. So many jobs created. That has to be good.

To the whingers, hold your little 'progress' meetings right up until the offer for your property comes in. The only thing that actually brings wealth to a community is people, people with a job/income.

A koala never made any community any wealth. Might give them a warm, fuzzy feeling for a while, but you cannot eat a warm fuzzy feeling. It adds nothing to the well being of a community. Upwards and upwards!!!!

Posted by burdened, 5/02/2010 7:01:42 PM, on Bayside Bulletin
Once again little Ms Williams has been caught out, she has had her finger in this pie for some time. Let's see you talk your way out of this one!!
Posted by tom, 5/02/2010 7:59:18 PM, on Bayside Bulletin
This has nothing to do with being a NIMBY! This has everything to do with the fact that the community was not consulted. There will be people living in shadow for 3 MONTHS OF THE YEAR!

Would YOU PAUL, like to live in shadow for 3 months of the year? Would you like to not be able to get out of your street because of upto 3000 extra car movements EVERY DAY.

As for Karen Williams being approachable, she has been nothing but obstructive and barely speaks to any one in the community unless it is to back pedal as fast as she can because the people of Capalaba are finally standing up to her.

The people of Aramac Court and surrounding streets would not have an issue if the development had stayed as it was at 52 town houses, and if the PREVIOUS council had consulted the community they would have known this.

Posted by Holland Cres, 5/02/2010 8:49:59 PM, on Bayside Bulletin
1 | 2 | 3 | 4  |  next >

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
WORRIED: Capalaba Progress Association member and resident Michael Ellisdiscusses his concerns with the 271-apartment development for Capalaba.
WORRIED: Capalaba Progress Association member and resident Michael Ellisdiscusses his concerns with the 271-apartment development for Capalaba.
NEGOTIATIONS: Capalaba Progress Association secretary and Aramac Court resident Christine Edmonds with Cr Karen Williams at the resident meeting to discuss the six storey, six building development.
NEGOTIATIONS: Capalaba Progress Association secretary and Aramac Court resident Christine Edmonds with Cr Karen Williams at the resident meeting to discuss the six storey, six building development.
PETITION POWER: Residents of Aramac Court and neighbuoring streets in Capalaba sign a petition to stop a 271-apartment development going ahead.
PETITION POWER: Residents of Aramac Court and neighbuoring streets in Capalaba sign a petition to stop a 271-apartment development going ahead.
SPREADING THE WORD: Residents of Aramac Court and neighbuoring streets in Capalaba held a community meeting to inform and organise against a 271-apartment development.
SPREADING THE WORD: Residents of Aramac Court and neighbuoring streets in Capalaba held a community meeting to inform and organise against a 271-apartment development.
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
26 November, 2009
10 December, 2009
21 December, 2009
POLL
Q: Is a 271-apartment block too high density for residential areas in the Redlands?

Yes
(69.1%)

No
(30.9%)

Total Votes: 136
Poll Date: 04 February, 2010

Most popular articles

1) Apple iPhone 4 32GB44 plans 12%
2) Apple iPhone 4 16GB44 plans 6%
3) HTC Desire4 plans 2%
4) Apple iPhone 3GS 8GB33 plans 2%
5) Sony Ericsson Xperia X10 Mini Pro37 plans 1%

Mobile Phones | Broadband Plans

Get the best deal at Fairfax Digital - Rural Press



Bayside Bulletin / The Redland Times







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Navigate

Classifieds

More Ways to Read

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2010. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...