News 
 Local News 
 News 
 General 
 Islanders protest paid parking plan 

Islanders protest paid parking plan

29 Oct, 2009 06:11 PM
NEARLY 100 residents of the Southern Moreton Bay Islands protested out the front of Redland City Council chambers in Cleveland on Wednesday afternoon, opposing the introduction of paid parking at Weinam Creek.

The placard-bearing crowd chanted “Not happy, Melva” and “We want free parking” while marching around the council water fountain and calling the council switchboard, attempting to jam the phone lines.

The crowd then moved into chambers for the 4pm general meeting, where councillor for Redland Bay and the bay islands Barbara Townsend presented a petition with 1717 signatures opposing the paid parking adopted by the council in August.

Macleay Island resident and spokesman for the petitioners Lindsay Hackett said the petition represented 76 per cent of the islands’ voting population.

“There is much anguish and anger within the community, caused by the contemptuous, isolationist and discriminatory attitude of the council towards the people of the bay islands in the noted Master Plan,” Mr Hackett said.

“The council must recognise the traditional and preeminent long term right of the islanders to park for free.”

Other islanders also addressed the council, with Lorraine Taylor criticising the council for “rubberstamping this non-plan” and Christine Larkman saying the council wasn’t listening to the protesting residents, who were “average members of the community, not rightwing activists – there are women here in their bowls club uniforms!”

Robin Harris, of the Macleay Island Progress Association, also spoke as the only member present from the council’s Southern Moreton Bay Islands Community Advisory Committee (SMBICAC), not supporting the protest but advocating ongoing talks with the council.

“Of course we’re not happy with the paid parking plan, but I believe the social impacts study the council has promised before bringing it in will have a broad scope and will reflect quite harshly on the current plan,” he said.

Most of the protestors, including Mr Hackett, had left the chambers by the time the council began debating how to move on the petition.

Cr Karen Williams moved that an additional sentence be included to prevent any work being done at Weinam Creek until the residents’ concerns were addressed, but this was opposed by Cr Townsend, who said there were already commitments not to proceed until the promised Social Impacts Study and Integrated Local Transport Plan had been initiated.

No motion was proposed by any councillor to abandon the paid parking plan, and more detail is expected next year after the completion of the social impact study.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

RELATED COVERAGE

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
I'm a mainland resident, but I feel for the people living on the Islands.

The parking situation is appalling.

It doesn't take the wisdom of Solomon to figure that an Island population requires some parking on the mainland.

Seems to me that the City has a duty to provide parking.

If you don't want to provide parking, don't allow development.

These people pay rates, and do not avail themselves of many of the City's services.

So maybe part of their rate money can be used to provide parking.

Seems our council allocates money for the unimportant, while ignoring the needs of the residents.

Posted by RedlandsDirect, 29/10/2009 5:28:52 PM
Sorry I wasn't there but my car needed work on the Australian mainland so I went fishing at Redland Bay instead.

But if they ever increase parking fees then I would not doubt the islander resolve to destroy the boom gates and ticketing machines.

Melva has not got a clue to the stupidity of what RCC is proposing.

Whoever thought up this stupid scheme should be retrained.

As for car spaces I heard Melva suggest on ABC Drive program to a third of what would be needed by year 2021.

Get real Melva and tell us the truth and don't underate the future need for Bay Islander parking on the Australian mainland.

Posted by Mud Crab, 29/10/2009 11:08:33 PM
Gee mud crab, I am so glad I do not know the islanders you claim to know.

Destroying anything you don't agree with. That's the attitude. Sounds like pub-talk. Being a future resident of the islands and knowing some island residents now, fairly confident in saying there are no wreckers in my list. Happily.

They are disappointed that things are about to change.

After many years of free parking, reality is about to arrive.

The population has risen to a point where someting had to be done.

There is also an argument around, that this will change the demographic of the islands. The theory being the islands will be flooded with people on benifits as they may not have a vehicle and will use the half-priced fares of the ferry and public transport.

I prefer to believe once this parking/car storage cost is known, prospective residents will be able to factor in this cost and make a reasonable decision about buying or renting on the secure and friendly islands.

There is a good chance this could kick-start growth on the islands.

Posted by burdened, 30/10/2009 11:03:08 AM
This article does not help to support the islanders in their resolve for fair treatment. Why, indeed, did the council take our development applications and give us building approvals, knowing that they wanted to abolish long-term parking?

Imagine if mainland residents needed to pay $90 every time they accessed their garage to park.

We simply cannot afford to take our cars home on the barge and worry about their safety every time we park there.

Give us a break and forget the fancy plan.

We need parking, not coffee shops. No-one uses the park as it is, so why provide further parks?

Free CAR PARKING is what is needed.

Posted by Louie, 30/10/2009 1:08:10 PM
Loise. where do you get $90 from?

You will have parking.

Try reading the plan and not listen to some goose down at the water taxi.

You may learn something.

Posted by tom, 30/10/2009 1:56:54 PM
Firstly, I would ask that the Bayside Bulletin please try and remain unbiased towards either party in this issue.

I'd like to applogize for not attending this time, as I was unable to pay ferry costs due to sudden Uni costs.

I did however attend the first meeting in the chambers and am not surpised by the results. The council of this shire is amazing to watch. Absolutely amazing. These people are my leaders. My role models! The people who I am supposed to respect and trust with the future of myself, my family and any future children I'll have.

I admit that they're humans and prone to mistakes but the well placed comments and thinly veiled insults that took place in both protest meetings in the council meeting were neither mistakes or misunderstandings.

The councillors just plain don't care.

They have their pay, they put on a good glossy show every election, and they do what is best for their own pocketbooks.

That's all there is to it. We're no more important to them than their own neighbours are.

Mainland or Island, we should all take a closer look at each of these men and women... It's a little frightening to think about.

Posted by Macleay student, 30/10/2009 2:57:12 PM
All well and good but what other parking has to pay $9 per day 5 days a week = $45.

1 year = $2340.

Plus our ferry fees of $63 a week= $3276 then maybe 6 barge trips to pick up large items=$504.

Rego for the second car on the main land $412.

Also if you have private parking = $70 a month or $840 per year.

Grand total approx for year $7372.

I would be better off paying a bridge toll of $10 per day = $2600.

OR, let's treat our water canals as our main roads with the state govt and the RCC sharing most of the cost then we may not mind paying the rates we do.

Plus on top of all this, in our now free carpark the PARKING police book cars on the weekend because they know that 90% of cars will be there over the time stated on sign within the carpark and on the streets, that cost approx $50.

Does any of this happen at Cleveland Point? I believe there are no timed parking within this area therfore FREE Parking.

I have heard it say by many of my Island friends that the reason for all this is that, the RCC have not the intelligence to come up with a solution of their own.

This plan is 7 years old maybe 8 now. I/We love our Islands DO NOT SPOIL THEM RCC. Thankyou

Posted by Maime & Pa, 30/10/2009 2:59:11 PM
The older generation has often commented on my generation and those younger than me, and on our lack of respect for our peers and our elders.

We've grown up seeing leaders such as these ones.

How can we respect our elders when the role model elders who we see daily, on the news, hear about from our parents and teachers, read about on newpapers, are leaders who behave like this?

Our 'role models' from the low council seats to the Prime Minister himself are corrupt and have no respect, empathy or compassion for human life.

History has shown that a mistreated minority must have their circumstances and mistreatment changed or they will crack.

And it isn't always pretty.

Things have got to change.

Posted by Another Uni Girl, 30/10/2009 3:01:51 PM
Tom, Louie will be able to learn something when cr insider gives us her words of wisdom.

After all she said this last time - "Things are changing and island residents will have to change with them.

You have plenty of time to look at options for your transport needs.

There is no going back.

Posted by insider, 1/09/2009 10:27:21 PM Will paid parking also be implemented at Toondah Harbour?

How about for councillors in Cleveland?

Posted by jumpy, 30/10/2009 3:24:31 PM
Macleay student & Another Uni Girl - Let me know when the next protest or meeting is - mr_a@tpg.com.au

I want to cover more local issues.

Posted by Matt, 30/10/2009 7:54:17 PM
1 | 2  |  next >

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Sue Sommerlad of Macleay Island said parking for islanders should come before foreshore coffee shops for mainlanders at Weinam Creek.
Sue Sommerlad of Macleay Island said parking for islanders should come before foreshore coffee shops for mainlanders at Weinam Creek.
Wendy Sponberg and Bev Timetti of the Macleay Island Bowls Club say there are many club members who need mainland cars for medical appointments and to tackle social isolation in the older population. Photo: Sally Walker-Brown.
Wendy Sponberg and Bev Timetti of the Macleay Island Bowls Club say there are many club members who need mainland cars for medical appointments and to tackle social isolation in the older population. Photo: Sally Walker-Brown.
Logie award winning actress and Macleay Island resident Val Lehmann alluded to her Prisoner character, Bee Smith, saying islanders should not be punished. Photo: Sally Walker-Brown.
Logie award winning actress and Macleay Island resident Val Lehmann alluded to her Prisoner character, Bee Smith, saying islanders should not be punished. Photo: Sally Walker-Brown.
The protesters out the front of Redland City Council Chambers. Photo: Sally Walker-Brown.
The protesters out the front of Redland City Council Chambers. Photo: Sally Walker-Brown.
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
22 October, 2009
29 October, 2009
MULTIMEDIA
29 October, 2009

Most popular articles

2010 Redland directory
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...