News 
 Local News 
 News 
 General 
 LNP rejects proposal to split islands 

LNP rejects proposal to split islands

04 Jan, 2010 03:12 PM
A proposal to remove the Southern Moreton Bay Islands from the Redland City Council planning scheme by Redlands MP, Peter Dowling, has been flatly rejected by his party, the LNP.

Shadow local government minister, Howard Hobbs, said if elected to government, the Liberal National Party recognised more funding was needed for the local council to help manage the island, but not to take them over entirely.

"The Southern Moreton Bay Islands are really an issue by themselves, I've always said the plan is the islands should remain with local government, and that's LNP policy," Mr Hobbs said.

"In 2001, I remember we had a policy for the Southern Moreton Bay Islands, which offered about $67million to help with island sewerage, infrastructure and roads sealing. The package was about $100million to assist the council overall, but we didn't win government and the money was lost, but I'm still very sympathetic to giving financial assistance to the council for island progress."

In September, Mr Dowling said the islands should be removed from Redland City Council, after islander outrage over the council's proposal to bring in paid parking at the Weinam Creek ferry terminal in Redland Bay.

"I believe SMBI needs to be removed from the planning scheme and treated as a special planning area to address the issues specific to island communities," he told parliament.

"Redland City Council is ill equipped and unable to fund the considerable infrastructure required. It is also beyond its purview to approve or consider what are rightly State Government responsibilities."

But Mr Hobbs said if elected to government, as local government minister that would not be their policy.

"As a former mayor myself, I have always placed more emphasis on the role of councils that state governments in planning, there should be state input but it's ultimately the role of the council to direct the planning of an area," he said.

Mr Hobbs also met with Redland City councillors during his visit and discussed the 2030 Visioning Project and the council's plans for meeting projected population growth.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

RELATED COVERAGE

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
Unfortunately Mr Hobbs, it seems to be a case of shutting the gate after the horse has bolted. This council led by Mayor Melva Hobson has already wasted millions of tax payers dollars on her failed koala coast. No wonder island infrastructure is still so far on the back foot.

The Redland community as a whole would have been far better off today had Mayor Hobson and her council actually listened to the rate payers and in which direction we preferred our money from our much overinflated rates bills, was to be allocated.

How on earth Mayor Hobson and her council has managed to put the island community last, the koala first and yet somehow, has still managed to stuff up both mainland and island infrastructures in the process is beyond me.

It is one thing to allocate lots of money for future planning in the shire but the problem now being experienced is where it was spent and what is there to show for it......(nothing).

Getting yourself elected Mr Hobbs will not be hard if you actually listen to and act on behalf of, the greater community of land owners and rate payers in the shire.

Posted by Nathan, 6/01/2010 9:20:59 AM, on Bayside Bulletin
Nathan, this is not Mayor Hobson's fault, it actually is the fault of her rude CARP councillor, because she is the one who nags the rest of the councillors into submission and gives the loser sign when she doesn't get her way.

Direct your anger towards her and her 'political advisor' and the rest of the CARP crew. And Mayor Hobson, learn to say NO to these selfish ego loving people.

Posted by Barbara, 6/01/2010 4:41:22 PM, on Bayside Bulletin
Thanks for the heads up Barbara. I stand corrected and make point that the carp councilor and political advisers have a hell of lot of explaining to do for the currant mess that Mr. Hobbs, if elected, will have to clean up. So we have a mayor because?.........
Posted by Nathan, 7/01/2010 2:34:43 PM, on Bayside Bulletin
They never give up, do they. Laming had his turn at getting some attention, now Dowling is attempting the same. Trying to be be/say something relevant. Keep in mind this is the same party that created the islands and are now making statements they know they do not have any obligation to keep. Local opposition politician's promises are always made with fingers crossed.
Posted by burdened, 7/01/2010 8:01:48 PM, on Bayside Bulletin

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
02 November, 2009
POLL
Q: Should the management of the SMBI be taken over by the State?

Yes, the council cannot afford all the islands' needs, the state would be better
(13.1%)

Yes, the council has not been doing a good job of managing the islands
(44.4%)

No, the council has been moving in the right direction and the islands will benefit
(5.1%)

No, the council is best placed but needs funding from the State
(25.3%)

Disagree with all options
(12.1%)

Total Votes: 99
Poll Date: 04 January, 2010

Most popular articles




 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...