News 
 Local News 
 News 
 Politics 
 State rushes to free up land 

State rushes to free up land

05 Jun, 2008 04:40 PM
ABOUT 300 hectares of semi-rural land in Thornlands could be opened up for housing as soon as Christmas as part of a State Government land release push.

Premier Anna Bligh has declared she wants to fast-track development in 17 South East Queensland sites including South East Thornlands and the Kinross Road area to improve housing affordability.

The move has infuriated some Redland City councillors and environmentalists who say checks and balances will be eroded, but developers insist it is a sensible idea that will help meet demand for housing.

Community consultation on a draft structure plan for South East Thornlands has just finished.

The plan, prepared by the former council, suggested opening up land between the Pinklands Sporting Complex and Eprapah Creek for between 3500 and 4000 residents.

The Kinross Road structure plan is still confidential but is believed to propose allowing a similar number of residents in the area, north of Boundary Road at Thornlands.

The Government promised this week to work with councils to “remove any regulatory hurdles” to development in the chosen sites over the next six months, with a team of planners cutting red tape.

Paul Barrett, managing director of Heritage Pacific, which owns land in South East Thornlands, said the plans had been under way for years and demand for housing was strong.

But Deputy Opposition Leader Fiona Simpson said Redland residents would not tolerate growth without adequate infrastructure.

“People sent a strong, clear message at the local government elections and it’s almost like the government says, ‘We don’t care’,” she told The Redland Times.

Redland Mayor Melva Hobson said while she was pleased to see the government fast-track its own planning process, she was “extremely disappointed” the council found out about the decision through the media.

Division 3 Councillor Debra Henry said the government was hiding behind housing affordability to support the development industry.

Division 4 Councillor Peter Dowling said the decision showed councils could be overruled on planning issues.

Wildlife Preservation Society spokesman Simon Baltais said he feared the community would be locked out of the process, while action group UPSET accused the government of ignoring residents.

State Labor Member for Redlands John English said he was “disappointed at the way the announcement was handled”.

Capalaba MP Michael Choi said he understood community sentiment and believed safeguards were needed.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

RELATED COVERAGE

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
This is not a Queensland Day joke, is it? Fancy sending young first home buyers to the edge of suburbia to live...away from public transport and jobs. Have the sea level rises been mapped for the Eprapah Creek corridor where some of these young home owners are to be plonked? By then the developers and cronies will have made their money and gone. About time the community was listened to... there are other places in the Redlands where population can be accommodated and which MIGHT have better public transport. For example, Capalaba. It is a business centre already where people could live and work and it has loads of capacity for development for living space. We don't want the 15000 extra vehicle movements a day generated by another 4000 houses down there. Thank you, Fiona Simpson, for speaking up for Redland City. Developers might have been working on the areas with the last Council "for years" but they never quite got it, did they? Where are they now?
Posted by Big Boy, 6/06/2008 7:08:35 AM
I haven't noticed more new houses makes them any cheaper. They just keep on going up. It'll leave a lot of developers even more wealthy and leave a poor group of people with no jobs, no decent roads, no extra schools, police stations or medical facilities stuck a long way from a major city. The slums of tomorrow is all that will be created. By rushing this through, with total disregard for the suitability of this land, it could potentially bring down house prices in the whole area with a slum on our doorsteps. Is that what Bligh is hoping for?
Posted by Sunny, 6/06/2008 8:07:35 AM
Well well well - cmon Mayor Hobson during the election campaign you promised this wouldnt happen - did you truly believe that or ......! Time to consult the 3 amigos that you have to work with at State Government level. and John English was dissapointed at the way the announcement was handled - what! Surely John knew what was going on in his own electorate......... or is he so far down the pecking order
Posted by The Watcher, 6/06/2008 10:38:46 AM
Where is Pinklands Sporting Complex to be located?
Posted by Peter, 6/06/2008 2:11:29 PM
What is this council on about? Ian Larkman of Canaipa Developments had all the i's dotted and the t's crossed when he applied for the resort on Russell Island under the last Mayor who gave it the thumbs up. For Melva Hobson to claim that she as new Mayor and spokesperson for the other councillor cronies to now state that she was "extremely disappointed" the council found out through the media about the new development is ridiculous. After all, she (on behalf of her followers) was the one who rejected Ian Larkman's previously approved resort on Russell Island (litigation proceedings pending). This will ultimately be funded by the tax payer. Obviously this resort would have also helped the crippling housing shortage and help the Redlands area as I'm sure this project in Thornlands will also do. I mean, why would the State Gov't inform her directly when she and her other unproductive cronies would have also attempted to railroad this development as well.
Posted by byron, 6/06/2008 2:12:20 PM
This will not makes houses cheaper.It will just mean more houses available for those who can afford them.The developers are right of course,demand for housing is strong.As long as that is the case the the sea of roof tops will continue to spread.The law after all is on the developers side.Of course its going to get more and more difficult to build affordable houses.Interest rates are up,driven primarily by the ever increasing price of oil.At the end of the day we all have to live somewhere.Just hope its an enviroment worth living in.
Posted by SCOT, 6/06/2008 5:46:09 PM
Our state government has learnt absolutely nothing about infrastructure being in place before known growth - pushing for SE Thornlands development 11 years before an upgrade of the Cleveland-Redland Bay Road in 2019 is absolute stupidity. Redlands voters will have much to remember, none of it good, at the next state election.
Posted by Redlands Taxi Driver, 6/06/2008 9:50:43 PM
It's interesting that the decisions to increase annual immigration to 300,000 has been virtually unreported in the Courier Mail newspaper, unlike the case with The Australian, also from the Murdoch stable, since the decision was announced on 15 (or 14?) May. On Friday 16 May there was an op-ed piece arguing for the Pacific guest worker program, but nothing else was reported for another week at least. As immigration into Australia is what ultimately drives inter-state immigration, which is said to make this anti-democratic trampling of the wishes of the Redland community necessary, this issue should be reported properly.
Posted by daggett, 8/06/2008 1:09:23 AM
Obviously these people commenting on the development of these areas being "steamrolled" through don't actually have a clue what has already been done. Planning for the SE Thornlands area has been underway for 4 years already, there is no reason that planning an area should take this long. It's such a shame that a great area like the redlands with so much opportunity moving forward is being crippled by an incompetant local government that is failing to responsibly deal with the growth of the region. I often laugh when reading these ridiculous posts by people who are obviously uneducated on the process and details concerning the planning of any area, SET in particular. Leave the planning to planners and do something about the redlands government not complying with population targets set out in the SEQ regional plan. I think the sooner that all power is taken from the council and given to the state gov the better. It is in the best interests of the future growth of redland and SEQ.
Posted by realistic, 16/06/2008 9:26:24 AM
Realistic seems to be agreeing with a whole host of issues already raised by others. Councillor Melva and her other Redland Shire Councillors are laughing stock.
Posted by byron, 17/06/2008 6:59:52 PM

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
LAND PUSH: Premier Anna Bligh (file photo)
LAND PUSH: Premier Anna Bligh (file photo)
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
05 June, 2008

Most popular articles

1) Apple iPhone 4 32GB44 plans 12%
2) Apple iPhone 4 16GB44 plans 6%
3) HTC Desire4 plans 2%
4) Apple iPhone 3GS 8GB33 plans 2%
5) Sony Ericsson Xperia X10 Mini Pro37 plans 1%

Mobile Phones | Broadband Plans

Get the best deal at Fairfax Digital - Rural Press



Bayside Bulletin / The Redland Times







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Navigate

Classifieds

More Ways to Read

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2010. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...